1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 40 | 102 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2160 mm |