1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1987 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1987 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Plymouth Sundance (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 415 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1987 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | A 40 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2470 mm |