1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1992 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1992 Mahindra Armada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1992 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 40 | Armada |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4310 mm |