1964 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Mercury MC4
To start off, 1997 Mercury MC4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury MC4 (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury MC4 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 1997 Mercury MC4 | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | A 40 | MC4 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |