1964 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 BMW Formula One
To start off, 2002 BMW Formula One is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,246 cc, 2002 BMW Formula One is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Formula One (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Formula One should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Formula One weights approximately 890 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Formula One (355 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Formula One will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 40 | 2002 BMW Formula One | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 40 | Formula One |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3246 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 82 Nm | 355 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 67 L |
