1964 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1276 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 40 | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3949 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 82 Nm | 395 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2036 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |
