1964 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1084 kg more than 1964 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1844 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 87 L |