1964 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 518 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 40 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 40 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 82 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |