1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1964 Austin A 60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 912 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Austin | Humber |
Model | A 60 | Pullman |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 120 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 6.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3330 mm |