1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1956 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1964 Austin A 60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 390 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 60 | 1956 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5112 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 223 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
