1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1970 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1076 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 60 | 1970 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3390 mm |
