1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 60 (122 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1964 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 350 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 125 L |