1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 1972 ZIL 114 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2055 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Austin | ZIL |
Model | A 60 | 114 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3770 mm |