1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |