1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1990 Renault Laguna
To start off, 1990 Renault Laguna is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Laguna (87 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1990 Renault Laguna.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Renault Laguna (181 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1990 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 60 | 1990 Renault Laguna | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 60 | Laguna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 87 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2550 mm |
