1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,204 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 470 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 60 | 1999 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 60 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4960 mm |
