1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Honda Integra
To start off, 1999 Honda Integra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda Integra weights approximately 79 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1999 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 60 | Integra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |