1964 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (114 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (373 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 1 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |