1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP) has 400 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 460 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |