1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Kia Avella
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Avella (72 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Avella should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Avella (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Avella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2000 Kia Avella | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | A 60 | Avella |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2400 mm |