1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 Pininfarina Start
To start off, 2001 Pininfarina Start is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Pininfarina Start is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pininfarina Start, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 60 | 2001 Pininfarina Start | |
| Make | Austin | Pininfarina |
| Model | A 60 | Start |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |
