1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 825 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Sierra (386 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Austin | GMC |
Model | A 60 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3380 mm |