1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 383 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (281 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 281 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 68 L |