1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 60 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 230 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 394 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 78 L |