1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Pontiac Solstice
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (287 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Solstice weights approximately 209 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2009 Pontiac Solstice | |
Make | Austin | Pontiac |
Model | A 60 | Solstice |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 287 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1329 kg |