1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 60 | S40 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 166 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |