1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 489 kg more than 1964 Austin A 60.
Because 1964 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (240 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 60 | S80 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 67 L |