1964 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60.
Because 2011 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 60 | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 65 L |