1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 252 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 90 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |