1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 802 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 90 | 102 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |