1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 1982 Skoda L is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 747 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 90 | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Austin | Skoda |
| Model | A 90 | L |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 38 L |
