1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1964 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1964 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | A 90 | No 1 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |