1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 90.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 90 | 1999 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 90 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2610 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2350 mm |
