1964 Austin A 90 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 692 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 90 | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |