1964 Austin A 90 vs. 2000 Citroen C2
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 90 (120 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 90 weights approximately 582 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 2000 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 90 | C2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 41 L |