1964 Austin A 90 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 90. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 90.
Because 2008 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1964 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 90 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 90 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
