1964 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 115 kg more than 1964 Austin A 90.
Because 1964 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 90 | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | Fusion |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |