1964 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 63 kg more than 1964 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (528 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin A 90 2012 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model A 90 Mustang
Year Released 1964 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 412 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 528 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1572 kg 1635 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 61 L