1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 99 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | A 99 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |