1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 99 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin A 99 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 99 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |
