1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Nissan Cedric is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 99 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 99 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |