1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1978 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1978 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Ford Mustang (138 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 99 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1978 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Ford Mustang. (197 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin A 99 1978 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model A 99 Mustang
Year Released 1964 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 107 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 197 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1215 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2560 mm