1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1979 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1979 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 380 kg more than 1964 Austin A 99.
Because 1964 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1964 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1979 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 99 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3090 mm |