1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (145 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 99. (107 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 99.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Starion (251 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Starion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 99 | Starion |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 251 Nm |
Top Speed | 162 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |