1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1984 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 1984 Dodge Lancer is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 99 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1984 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1984 Dodge Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 99 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1964 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |