1964 Austin A 99 vs. 1990 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1990 Mahindra Armada is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin A 99 (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1990 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 470 kg more than 1964 Austin A 99.
Because 1990 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 1990 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 99 | Armada |
Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4310 mm |