1964 Austin A 99 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 99.
Because 1964 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin A 99 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin A 99 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 99 | 5 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |