1964 Austin A 99 vs. 2012 Hyundai ix35

To start off, 2012 Hyundai ix35 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Hyundai ix35 (113 HP @ 400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai ix35 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Hyundai ix35 weights approximately 7 kg more than 1964 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai ix35, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Hyundai ix35 (260 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 99. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Hyundai ix35 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin A 99 2012 Hyundai ix35
Make Austin Hyundai
Model A 99 ix35
Year Released 1964 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1685 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 107 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 400 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 260 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 1250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 77.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 17:01
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1537 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2640 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]