1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1948 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 620 kg more than 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1948 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Talbot |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 1964 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3160 mm |