1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1952 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1952 Nissan Sedan. (18 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1952 Nissan Sedan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 390 kg more than 1952 Nissan Sedan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1952 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | Sedan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 860 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 790 kg |
